Practical Public Administration: A Response to Academic Critique of the Reinvention Trilogy

Main Article Content

Ted Gaebler Alexandra Miller

Abstract

Our purpose in writing is two-fold: to incite governments to change and adapt their processes as societies change, and to encourage public administration academia to help governments in this endeavor. While we admire Lane’s work and his devotion to his study, we cannot help but argue that his criticism of Osborne’s works lacks relevancy and credibility.

Article Details

Section
Articles